Human Rights Due Diligence Tool

PCM Phase | No | Rights/Protections | Category | Subcategory | Indicator | Question | Considerations | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.1 | Right to life; Right to equality and non-discrimination; Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; Freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; Right to an adequate standard of living. | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Proportion of project target areas where comprehensive human rights risks are identified and analyzed, with risks categorized by severity level (high/medium/low) and affected population groups | How comprehensive is the conflict analysis for Northwest Syria, including potential human rights impacts? | Assess power structures, identify vulnerable groups (e.g., IDPs, religious minorities), analyze potential rights violations (e.g., arbitrary detention, forced displacement), and evaluate environmental impacts of conflict (e.g., destruction of infrastructure, contamination of water sources). | UDHR Art. 1, 2; ICCPR Art. 6, 3, 26; ICESCR Art. 11; CRC Art. 6; UNCAT Art. 1, 16; UNGA Res 76/300; IHL's principles of distinction, humane treatment, and of non-discrimination, CIHL Rules 28, 29, 43, 50, 52, 55, 56, 93, 100, 131, 132, 133, and 136; SPHERE Protection Principles. |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.2 | Right to life; Freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; Freedom of movement | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of project target areas with protection risk mapping completed, including clearly identified threat levels and vulnerable groups | What specific protection risks have been identified in Northwest Syria? | Assess security threats from ongoing conflict, restrictions on freedom of movement due to checkpoints and frontlines, risks of forced displacement from military operations, prevalence of arbitrary detention by various armed groups, and instances of torture or ill-treatment in detention facilities. | ICCPR Art. 6, 7, 9, 12; UNCAT Art. 1, 16; IHL's principle of humane treatment and CIHL Rules 56, 93, and 129; SPHERE Protection Principles |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.3 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Number of barriers to service access identified per vulnerable group (women, elderly, disabled, minorities) with corresponding severity rating | How thoroughly have the needs and risks unique to vulnerable groups in Northwest Syria been assessed? | Identify specific vulnerabilities of IDPs (e.g., lack of documentation, such as birth certificates or national IDs, which restricts access to healthcare and education; multiple displacements, as seen in Northwest Syria, where families are repeatedly uprooted due to conflict), ethnic/religious minorities (e.g., discrimination in aid distribution, such as Kurdish communities being deprioritized in humanitarian assistance; targeted violence), and persons with disabilities (e.g., lack of accessible services, such as WASH facilities unsuitable for those with mobility challenges in IDP camps; limited access to assistive devices, leaving many unable to navigate rough terrain) that prevent these groups from accessing aid. | CEDAW, CRC, CRPD, ICESCR Art. 2, 3; IHL's principles of non-discrimination and of impartiality and CIHL Rules 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Core Standards, |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.4 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage of female beneficiaries reporting barriers to accessing services | How comprehensive is the gender analysis for Northwest Syria? | Examine gender roles in the context of displacement and conflict, assess GBV risks (e.g., early marriage in IDP camps), evaluate women's participation in decision-making processes, and analyze gender-specific barriers to accessing services (e.g., lack of female healthcare providers). | CEDAW, UNSCR 1325; IHL's principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination and CIHL Rule 134; IASC Gender Handbook, |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.5 | Right to own property; Right to adequate housing | Sector Specific | Shelter/HLP | Number of active HLP disputes affecting project implementation areas, categorized by type and severity | How thoroughly have Housing, Land and Property (HLP) rights issues been assessed in Northwest Syria? | Investigate land ownership disputes arising from multiple displacements, assess risks of forced evictions in areas under different control, document property destruction or seizure due to conflict, and identify documentation issues preventing persons, including IDPs and other vulnerable groups, from claiming property rights. | UDHR Art. 17; CEDAW Art.15, 16; CRPD Art. 12; ICESCR Art. 11(1); IHL's principle of distinction and IHL's prohibition of pillage, CIHL Rules 50, 51, 52, and 133; Pinheiro Principles; NRC Housing, Land and Property Rights |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.6 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Percentage of undocumented persons who are unable to access aid | How comprehensive is the assessment of civil documentation needs in Northwest Syria? | Evaluate the extent of missing documentation due to displacement or conflict, assess how lack of documents impacts access to services (e.g., education, healthcare), and analyze restrictions on freedom of movement due to checkpoint systems requiring specific documentation. | UDHR Art. 6, ICCPR Art. 3, 26; IHL's principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination and CIHL Rule 55; UNHCR Emergency Handbook |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.7 | Right to education; Protection from child labour; Protection from recruitment or participation of children in hostilities | Sector Specific | Child Protection | Percentage of children in target area exposed to specific protection risks, categorized by risk type and age group | How thorough is the child protection risk assessment for Northwest Syria? | Assess risks of family separation during displacement, evaluate the prevalence of child recruitment by armed groups, analyze barriers to education access in conflict-affected areas, and investigate child labour risks in IDP camps and host communities. | ICESCR Art. 10(3), 13; CRC Art. 19, 28, 32, 38; IHL's principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination and CIHL Rules 131 and 136;Child Protection Minimum Standards (CPMS) |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.8 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment;Right to development; Right to health | Cross-Cutting | Environmental Protection | Number of identified environmental risks with potential human rights impacts, ranked by severity and likelihood | How comprehensive is the environmental impact assessment for Northwest Syria? | Evaluate resource depletion (e.g., water resources in IDP camps), assess waste management challenges in areas with damaged infrastructure, analyze pollution risks from conflict-related activities. Evaluate damage to the natural environment due to hostilities. | UNGA Res 76/300, ICESCR Art. 1(1),12; ICCPR Art 1(1); IHL's principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution and CIHL Rules 43, 44, and 45; SPHERE Environmental Standards |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.9 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Percentage of identified MHPSS cases assessed to determine needs, barriers to support, and potential intervention strategies, categorized by type of required intervention | How thorough is the Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) needs assessment for Northwest Syria? | Assess prevalence of trauma related to conflict and displacement, evaluate availability and capacity of MHPSS services in different areas, analyze cultural attitudes towards mental health that may affect service uptake, and identify integration needs with other humanitarian sectors. | ICESCR Art. 12, CRPD Art. 25; IHL's principle of non-discrimination and CIHL Rule 55; IASC MHPSS Guidelines |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.1 | Right to development | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of service gaps identified and analyzed to determine capacity-building needs and opportunities, categorized by sector | How comprehensive is the assessment of local capacity and resources in Northwest Syria? | Evaluate the capacity of local NGOs operating in different areas of control, assess community structures that can support humanitarian response, identify available skills within displaced and host communities, and analyze resource gaps that may hinder effective response. | ICESCR Art. 1(1), ICCPR Art. 1(1); CHS Commitment 3 |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.11 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of target population with access to critical information through diverse channels, assessed monthly and disaggregated by demographic groups | How thorough is the assessment of information needs and access in Northwest Syria? | Examine primary information sources used by different communities, assess literacy rates among displaced and host populations, identify language barriers (e.g., Kurdish-speaking minorities), and evaluate access to technology for information dissemination in different areas. | ICCPR Art. 19, UDHR Art. 19; IHL's principle of non-discrimination and impartiality; CIHL Rule 55; SPHERE Core Standard 4 |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.12 | Right to an adequate standard of living (food) | Sector Specific | Food Security | Percentage of food-insecure households receiving targeted assistance, measured monthly and categorized by intervention type and impact on food security status | How comprehensive is the food security assessment for Northwest Syria? | Analyze market access challenges due to conflict lines and checkpoints, assess impact of economic crisis and currency depreciation on food prices, evaluate local food availability in different areas of control, consider cultural food preferences of diverse communities, and assess religious requirements (e.g., halal food) in aid provision, gather information on percentage of food-insecure households receiving targeted assistance. | ICESCR Art. 11(1); IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination; SPHERE Food Security Standards |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.13 | Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | WASH | Percentage of WASH facilities assessed to identify gaps in meeting minimum safety and adequacy standards, with findings categorized by facility type. | How thorough is the assessment of WASH needs and barriers in IDP settlements across Northwest Syria? | Evaluate water availability in different IDP settlements, considering seasonal variations and conflict-related infrastructure damage. Assess sanitation infrastructure in formal and informal camps, analyze gender-specific WASH needs (e.g., menstrual hygiene management), and evaluate environmental impact of current WASH practices on scarce water resources. | ICESCR Art. 11(1), 12; IHL's principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination and CIHL Rules 134, 135 and 138; UNGA Res 64/292; SPHERE WASH Standards; |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.14 | Right to private and family life | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of separated families identified and assessed to determine their needs, barriers to reunification, and appropriate support options. | How comprehensive is the assessment of family separation risks in Northwest Syria? | Analyze displacement patterns that may lead to family separation, assess documentation issues that prevent family reunification across conflict lines, evaluate the situation of unaccompanied minors in IDP camps, and assess the capacity and challenges of existing family tracing mechanisms in the complex political landscape. | ICCPR Art. 17, 23; CIHL Rule 131; CPMS Standard 13 |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.15 | Right to life | Crose-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of high-risk areas identified and assessed to determine vulnerabilities, threats, and the need for civilian protection measures | How comprehensive is the assessment of risks related to chemical weapons use and siege tactics in Northwest Syria? | Evaluate the prevalence of chemical weapons attacks in the region, assess the capacity of local health facilities to respond to such attacks, analyze the impact of siege tactics on civilian access to essential goods and services, and identify vulnerable populations at heightened risk. | IHL's principles of distinction, precaution, and proportionality and CIHL Rules 53, 70 and 74; Geneva Protocol 1925; Chemical Weapons Convention; UNSC Res 2139. |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.16 | Protection from child marriage; Protection from child labour; Right to education; Protection from recruitment or participation of children in hostilities | Sector Specific | Child Protection | Percentage of identified child protection cases analyzed to determine the type of violation, priority needs, and appropriate intervention strategies | How thorough is the assessment of child recruitment by armed groups and early marriage practices in Northwest Syria? | Analyze patterns of child recruitment, including push and pull factors, assess the prevalence of early marriage among displaced populations, evaluate the impact on children's access to education, and identify community-based protection mechanisms. | CRC Art. 38; CEDAW Art. 16; CIHL Rules 136 and 137; CPMS Standard 12 |
1. Assessment (Situation Analysis) | 1.17 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment;Right to health;Right to development | Cross-Cutting | Environmental Protection | Number of identified environmental hotspots evaluated for potential risks and mitigation strategies, with an emphasis on anticipated impacts on affected populations. | How comprehensive is the assessment of environmental rights and impacts in Northwest Syria, considering the protracted nature of the conflict? | Evaluate long-term environmental degradation due to conflict, assess the impact of displacement on natural resources, analyze climate change vulnerabilities specific to the region, and identify opportunities for sustainable resource management in humanitarian programming. | ICESCR Art. 1, 12; ICCPR Art. 1(1); UNGA Res 76/300; CIHL Rules 43, 44, and 45; UNEP Environmental Peacebuilding principles; SPHERE Environmental Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.1 | Freedom of movement | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of high-priority protection risks with implemented and monitored mitigation measures, evaluated regularly for effectiveness | How does the project design address specific protection risks identified in Northwest Syria? | Develop measures to address arbitrary detention risks, create strategies to mitigate forced recruitment, especially of youth. Plan interventions to address restrictions on freedom of movement due to checkpoints. | ICCPR 12; UDHR Art. 13; SPHERE Protection Principles |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.2 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage of vulnerable individuals experiencing reduced barriers or enhanced availability and quality of services following the implementation of targeted support measures, assessed semi-annually through structured feedback and service utilization data. | How comprehensively does the project design incorporate support for vulnerable groups in Northwest Syria? | Include tailored assistance for female-headed households, considering their increased economic vulnerability. Design accessibility measures for persons with disabilities, accounting for the challenging terrain and damaged infrastructure. Develop special protections for unaccompanied minors, addressing risks of exploitation and recruitment. Plan targeted support for the elderly, including elderly IDPs, considering their specific health and mobility needs in displacement contexts. | UDHR Art. 6, ICCPR Art. 3, 16 26; CRPD Art. 11; CEDAW; IHL's principles of humane treatment. non-discrimination. and impartiality; CIHL Rules 134 and 138; SPHERE Core Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.3 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage of staff and partners trained on and implementing non-discrimination protocols, assessed quarterly through spot checks and beneficiary feedback | How does the project design ensure non-discrimination in service provision across Northwest Syria? | Plan for equitable access across different ethnic groups, considering historical tensions and current power dynamics. Develop measures to prevent discrimination based on political affiliation, particularly in areas with competing governance structures. Design strategies to reach marginalized communities, including those in remote or besieged areas. | UDHR Art. 6, ICCPR Art. 3, 16 26; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rule 53; SPHERE Core Standard 1 |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.4 | Right to own property; Right to adequate housing | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of undocumented beneficiaries successfully accessing services through alternative verification methods, tracked monthly by service type | How does the project design address civil documentation issues specific to Northwest Syria? | Include support for obtaining or replacing lost documents, design alternative verification methods for accessing services, plan advocacy strategies with de facto authorities on documentation issues. | UDHR Art. 6, 17; ICESCR Art. 11(1); CEDAW Art. 15, 16; CRPD Art. 12; CIHL Rules 50, 51 (applicable in the context of belligerent occupation), 52, and 133; UNHCR Emergency Handbook |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.5 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage reduction in reported GBV incidents following implementation of risk mitigation measures, assessed quarterly in project locations | How comprehensively does the project design address GBV risks in Northwest Syria? | Plan for safe spaces for women and girls, considering the increased risks in displacement settings. Design GBV response services adapted to the local context, including cultural sensitivities and access challenges. Develop community-based protection mechanisms, leveraging existing social structures. Create male engagement strategies to address root causes of GBV in the context of conflict and displacement. | CEDAW; UNSCR 1325; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination and CIHL Rules 104 (pertaining to respect of convictions and religious practices), 131, and 134; IASC GBV Guidelines |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.6 | Right to education; Protection from child labour; Protection from recruitment or participation of children in hostilities | Sector Specific | Child Protection | Percentage of project components with fully implemented and monitored child protection measures, evaluated quarterly for effectiveness | How thoroughly are child protection measures integrated into the project design for Northwest Syria? | Include education in emergencies programming, addressing the high rates of out-of-school children. Design family reunification services, considering the complexities of cross-line and cross-border tracing. Plan psychosocial support for children affected by conflict, addressing trauma and stress. Develop prevention strategies for child recruitment, considering the proximity to armed groups in many areas. | ICESCR Art. 13; CRC Art. 19, 28, 32, 38; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 135, 136, and 137; CPMS; INEE Minimum Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.7 | Freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; Right to an adequate standard of living; Protection from child labour; Protection from recruitment or participation of children in hostilities | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of suppliers meeting human rights compliance standards, assessed annually through third-party audits | How does the procurement plan address human rights risks specific to Northwest Syria? | Design vetting processes for suppliers, checking for links to armed groups or sanctioned entities. Conduct due diligence on land acquisition for project sites, considering the complex property rights issues in conflict-affected areas. Ensure labour rights compliance in local hiring, addressing risks of exploitation in a context of limited economic opportunities. | ICCPR Art. 7; UNCAT; ICESCR Art. 10(3) and Art. 11(1); CRC Art. 32; UDHR Art. 17; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination and CIHL Rules 50, 51 (applicable in the context of belligerent occupation), 52, 90, 135, 136 and 137; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Core Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.8 | Right to own property; Right to adequate housing | Sector Specific | Shelter/HLP | Percentage of HLP-related disputes successfully resolved through project-supported mechanisms, tracked monthly and categorized by type of dispute | How comprehensively are HLP rights considerations integrated into the project design for Northwest Syria? | Plan support for IDPs in securing tenure rights, design mechanisms to address property disputes, and develop safeguards against forced evictions. | UDHR Art. 17; CEDAW Art. 15, 16; CRPD Art. 12; ICESCR Art. 11(1); CIHL Rules 50, 51 (applicable in the context of belligerent occupation), 52, and 133; Pinheiro Principles;; NRC Housing, Land and Property Rights |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.9 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of community feedback leading to documented project adaptations, analyzed monthly and disaggregated by feedback type and source | How will affected populations be meaningfully consulted throughout the project cycle in Northwest Syria? | Design regular community feedback mechanisms, considering access and security challenges in different areas. Develop inclusive participation strategies that account for power dynamics and marginalized groups. Plan conflict-sensitive consultation methods that do not exacerbate tensions between host communities and IDPs or between different ethnic or political groups. | ICCPR Art. 19; UDHR Art. 19; IHL’s principles of non-discrimination and impartiality; CIHL Rule 55; CHS Commitment 4 |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.1 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment;Right to health; Right to development | Cross-Cutting | Environmental Protection | Percentage reduction in negative environmental impacts following implementation of mitigation measures, assessed bi-annually through environmental audits | How comprehensively does the project design address environmental impacts in Northwest Syria? | Plan for sustainable water resource management, considering the strain on resources due to displacement and conflict. Design waste management solutions for IDP camps, addressing the environmental and health risks of improper disposal. Develop energy-efficient shelter solutions, considering the limited electricity supply in many areas. Plan for environmental impact assessments that account for the cumulative effects of prolonged conflict and displacement. | UNGA Res 76/300; ICESCR Art. 1(1), 12; CIHL Rule 131; SPHERE Environmental Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.11 | Freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; Protection from child labour;Protection from recruitment or participation of children in hostilities | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of suppliers demonstrating improved human rights compliance after implementation of contractual checkpoints, evaluated annually | How comprehensive is the plan for ongoing human rights monitoring of suppliers in Northwest Syria? | Design regular audit processes for local partners, considering the challenges of operating in a complex and changing environment. Develop human rights clauses for contracts that address the specific risks in Northwest Syria. Plan capacity building on human rights for suppliers, focusing on the most relevant issues in the local context. | ICCPR Art. 7; UNCAT; ICESCR Art. 10(3); CRC Art. 32; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination and CIHL Rules 90, 135, 136 and 137; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Core Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.12 | Right to adequate food | Sector Specific | Food Security | Percentage of beneficiaries reporting improved food security without increased protection risks, measured quarterly through household surveys | How does the project design ensure food security in Northwest Syria? | Plan for a diverse food basket that reflects local preferences and addresses nutritional needs. Design support for local agriculture, considering the impact of conflict on farming practices and land access. Develop cash/voucher programs adapted to local market conditions and inflation rates. Plan nutrition interventions for vulnerable groups, addressing the specific challenges of malnutrition in a protracted crisis. | ICESCR Art. 11; CIHL Rule 104; SPHERE Food Security Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.13 | Right to water and sanitation;Right to health | Sector Specific | WASH | Percentage of users reporting increased safety and dignity when using WASH facilities, assessed quarterly through gender-disaggregated surveys | How comprehensively are WASH services designed to meet needs in Northwest Syria? | Plan water trucking for underserved areas, design sanitation solutions for informal settlements, develop hygiene promotion adapted to local practices and beliefs. | ICESCR Art. 11(1), 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135 and 138; UNGA Res 64/292; SPHERE WASH Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.14 | Right to education; Protection from child labour | Sector Specific | Education | Percentage increase in school attendance rates following implementation of safety and accessibility measures, tracked monthly and disaggregated by gender and disability status | How does the project design ensure safe education access in Northwest Syria? | Plan mobile or home-based learning options, addressing the risks of targeted attacks on schools. Design catch-up classes for out-of-school children, considering the years of education lost due to conflict. Develop teacher training on psychosocial support, addressing the trauma experienced by both educators and students. Plan school rehabilitation with safety features, considering the risks of unexploded ordnance and potential airstrikes. | CRC Art. 28, 29; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and of non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 135 and 138; ICESCR Art. 10(3), 13; INEE Minimum Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.15 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Percentage of target population reporting improved access to essential health services after strategy implementation, evaluated semi-annually | How comprehensively are health services designed to overcome barriers in Northwest Syria? | Plan for mobile clinics to reach remote areas, considering the destruction of health infrastructure and security risks. Design telemedicine options to provide specialist care in areas lacking qualified personnel. Develop support programs for local health workers, addressing the brain drain caused by conflict. Plan for the integration of mental health services, considering the high prevalence of trauma and stress disorders. Ensure cultural and religious sensitivity in service provision, particularly regarding gender norms in healthcare access. | ICESCR Art. 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 25, 26, 28, 29, 30 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Health Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.16 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage increase in women's income and economic participation following implementation of empowerment measures, assessed annually | How comprehensively does the project design incorporate gender-sensitive planning beyond GBV prevention? | Include measures to promote women's economic empowerment, such as vocational training programs, microfinance initiatives, and support for women-led businesses. Design strategies to ensure women's meaningful participation in leadership roles and community governance structures. Consider quotas for women's representation in project committees and develop leadership training programs. | CEDAW Art. 3, 7, 11; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rule 134; UNSCR 1325; SPHERE Core Standards |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.17 | Right to an effective remedy | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of advocacy engagements resulting in documented improvements in human rights practices by local authorities, tracked quarterly | How does the project design account for the human rights obligations of de facto authorities, particularly regarding justice and reparations? | Consider strategies for engaging with de facto authorities on human rights issues, plan for advocacy on access to justice for victims of violations, design support mechanisms for documentation of abuses, and develop approaches for promoting accountability within the constraints of the operational context. | UDHR Art. 8; ICCPR Art. 2; CIHL Rule 139; UN Basic Principles on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation |
2. Design (Planning) | 2.18 | Multiple rights | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Percentage of project outcomes meeting or exceeding adapted Sphere standards, evaluated annually through third-party assessments | How comprehensively does the project design incorporate existing humanitarian standards familiar to organizations operating in Northwest Syria? | Ensure alignment with Sphere Standards, Core Humanitarian Standards, and sector-specific guidelines (e.g., INEE Minimum Standards for Education). Consider how these standards can be adapted to the specific context of Northwest Syria while maintaining their core principles. | Sphere Handbook; Core Humanitarian Standard; INEE Minimum Standards; IASC Guidelines |
3. Implementation | 3.1 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Percentage of high-priority protection risks with mitigation measures implemented and effectiveness monitored quarterly, aiming for 80% coverage within 6 months | How effectively is MHPSS being integrated across sectors in Northwest Syria? | Implement MHPSS training for frontline workers across sectors. Establish referral pathways between MHPSS services and other humanitarian interventions. Monitor the uptake and effectiveness of integrated MHPSS services, adapting approaches based on community feedback and cultural considerations. | ICESCR Art. 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL 134, 135, and 138; IASC MHPSS Guidelines |
3. Implementation | 3.2 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage of identified vulnerable individuals accessing at least one tailored support service within 30 days, disaggregated by group (e.g., women, children, disabled), with a target of 75% coverage | How comprehensively are support measures for vulnerable groups being implemented in Northwest Syria, including safety considerations in shelters? | Track service accessibility for specific groups (e.g., female-headed households, persons with disabilities, elderly IDPs). Assess the effectiveness of special assistance provision (e.g., targeted aid for unaccompanied minors). Evaluate feedback mechanisms' responsiveness to vulnerable groups' needs. Monitor adaptation of services to meet changing needs. Ensure safety measures in shelters address gender-based violence risks and accessibility for persons with disabilities. | CRPD Art. 11;CEDAW; ICESCR Art. 2, 3; UDHR Art. 1, 2, 3; ICCPR Art. 26; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 55, 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Core Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.3 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of beneficiaries reporting non-discriminatory access to services, measured monthly through surveys, aiming for 90% positive responses across all demographic groups | How effectively are services being provided without discrimination based on displacement status, ethnicity, or political affiliation in Northwest Syria? | Ensure equal access to services across different ethnic groups and political affiliations, particularly in areas with diverse populations or changing control. Implement and monitor fair distribution mechanisms that prevent favoritism or exclusion. Maintain transparent selection criteria for aid recipients and communicate these clearly to affected populations. | ICCPR Art. 26; ICESCR Art. 2; UDHR Art. 2; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 55, 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Core Standard 1 |
3. Implementation | 3.4 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Percentage of undocumented individuals successfully accessing services through alternative verification methods, tracked monthly, with a target of 70% access rate within 3 months | How comprehensively are measures being implemented to assist beneficiaries lacking civil documentation in Northwest Syria? | Implement alternative verification methods that allow undocumented individuals to access services. Conduct advocacy with de facto authorities on documentation issues, considering the complex political landscape. Provide legal assistance referrals for those facing documentation challenges. Consider the specific needs of IDPs who may have lost documents during multiple displacements. | UDHR Art. 6; ICCPR Art. 16; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 55, 56, and 131; UNHCR Emergency Handbook |
3. Implementation | 3.5 | Right to equality and non-discrimination; Freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of reported GBV cases receiving response services within 72 hours, tracked weekly, aiming for 85% response rate | How effectively are GBV prevention and response measures being implemented in Northwest Syria? | Establish and maintain safe reporting mechanisms adapted to the local context. Ensure functional referral pathways that consider the fragmented health system. Provide regular staff training on GBV prevention and response, including cultural sensitivity. Implement community-based protection mechanisms that engage local leaders. Develop and implement male engagement strategies to address root causes of GBV. | UNCAT; ICCPR Art. 7; CEDAW; UNSCR 1325; ICESCR Art. 3; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 93 and 134; IASC GBV Guidelines |
3. Implementation | 3.6 | Right to education; Protection from child labour | Sector Specific | Child Protection | Number of children benefiting from child protection measures, disaggregated by type of intervention (e.g., education, psychosocial support) | How comprehensively are child protection measures being mainstreamed across activities in Northwest Syria, including safety in shelters? | Establish safe spaces in shelters and community areas, implement family separation prevention measures, ensure access to education, including alternative learning programs. | ICESCR Art. 10(3), 13; CRC Art. 28, 32, 38; ICESCR Art. 10; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131 and 135; CPMS |
3. Implementation | 3.7 | Right to an adequate standard of living; Protection from child labour | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of new suppliers to undergo human rights vetting before contract approval, with annual re-assessments of existing suppliers | How thoroughly have suppliers entering the tender been vetted against the risk of human rights abuses in the context of Northwest Syria? | Conduct thorough vetting of suppliers' connections to de facto authorities or armed groups known for human rights violations. Investigate any involvement in HLP rights violations, particularly in areas with frequent property disputes. Check for use of child labour in the supply chain, considering the economic pressures on families in the region. Assess any support to human rights abuses through financial or material donations to parties to the conflict. | ICCPR Art. 7; UNCAT; ICESCR Art. 10(3); CRC Art. 32; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 50, 51, 52, 133; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Core Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.8 | Right to own property; Right to adequate housing | Sector Specific | Shelter/HLP | Number of HLP rights violations addressed through project mechanisms, with documented outcomes | How effectively is the system for monitoring HLP rights throughout project implementation functioning in Northwest Syria? | Ensure a monitoring system is established at project start that considers the complex property rights situation in NW Syria. Implement a mechanism to address HLP issues as they arise, including disputes related to multiple displacements or destruction of property records. Document trends in HLP violations and their impact on project implementation. | UDHR Art. 17; ICESCR Art. 11(1); CEDAW Art. 15, 16; CRPD Art. 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 50, 51, 52, 133, 134, 135, and 138; Pinheiro Principles;NRC Housing, Land and Property Rights |
3. Implementation | 3.9 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Frequency and quality of community consultations conducted, with participation rates disaggregated by gender and vulnerability status | How comprehensively is the process for ongoing consultation with affected populations being implemented during project implementation in Northwest Syria? | Conduct regular feedback sessions that are accessible and safe for all groups, including women and marginalized communities. Implement mechanisms to incorporate community input into project adjustments, considering the rapidly changing context. Document how consultation informs project decisions and communicate this back to the community. Ensure consultation methods are conflict-sensitive and do not exacerbate local tensions. | ICCPR Art. 19; UDHR Art. 19; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CHS Commitment 4 |
3. Implementation | 3.1 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; Right to health; Right to development | Cross-Cutting | Environmental Protection | Percentage of projects with documented environmental impact assessments and mitigation plans that are regularly updated and adapted to local conditions. | How effectively are environmental impacts being monitored and mitigated in Northwest Syria? | Monitor waste management practices, particularly in IDP camps with limited infrastructure. Track resource consumption, especially water usage in water-scarce areas. Assess environmental damage from project activities and conflict-related factors. Evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures, adapting them to the changing local context. Consider long-term environmental sustainability in all interventions. | UNGA Res 76/300; ICESCR Art. 1, 12; ICCPR Art. 1; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Environmental Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.11 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; Right to health; Right to development | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Number of IDP camps implementing waste management and resource consumption tracking systems, with quarterly reports on environmental impact mitigation. | How effectively are environmental impacts being monitored and mitigated in Northwest Syria? | Monitor waste management practices, particularly in IDP camps, track resource consumption, especially water usage in water-scarce areas, implement and adapt mitigation measures to the changing local context. | UNGA Res 76/300; ICESCR Art. 1, 12; SPHERE Environmental Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.12 | Right to adequate food | Sector Specific | Food Security | Percentage of food distribution points with established complaint mechanisms and documented adaptations to food baskets based on community feedback and nutritional assessments. | How effectively are food security interventions being implemented with protection considerations specific to Northwest Syria? | Ensure safe access routes for food distribution, considering conflict dynamics and checkpoint issues. Implement fair distribution mechanisms that prevent exploitation by local power holders. Establish robust complaint mechanisms accessible to all groups. Regularly assess and adapt food baskets to meet local preferences and nutritional needs. Consider cash/voucher programs where markets are functional. | ICESCR Art. 11; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Food Security Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.13 | Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | WASH | Percentage of WASH facilities with gender-sensitive designs and community-based maintenance systems, with biannual feedback collection from users | How comprehensively are WASH services being implemented with protection considerations in Northwest Syria? | Monitor safe access to WASH facilities, particularly for women and girls. Ensure gender sensitivity in facility design and placement. Implement community-based maintenance systems to ensure sustainability. Regularly collect and respond to community feedback on WASH services. Assess and mitigate environmental impacts of WASH interventions, particularly in water-scarce areas. | ICESCR Art. 11, 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; UNGA Res 64/292; SPHERE WASH Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.14 | Right to education | Sector Specific | Education | Percentage of schools implementing safety measures, including transportation safety protocols and documentation assistance programs, specifically addressing barriers for girls' education. | How effectively are measures being implemented to ensure safe education access in Northwest Syria, with specific considerations for girls' safety and participation? | Implement transportation safety measures, considering risks of attacks on schools. Ensure school protection measures are in place, including early warning systems and safe rooms. Address documentation barriers that prevent school enrollment, particularly for IDPs. Maintain education quality standards despite challenging circumstances. Address specific risks and barriers for girls' education, including early marriage, lack of female teachers, and cultural barriers. Implement measures to prevent and respond to sexual harassment or exploitation in educational settings. | CRC Art. 28, 29; CEDAW Art. 10; IHL’s principles of distinction, humane treatment, and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131 and 135; ICESCR Art. 13; INEE Minimum Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.15 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Percentage of health facilities conducting regular assessments of access barriers, including cost and cultural sensitivity, with integration of mental health services into primary healthcare. | How comprehensively is the monitoring of health service access barriers being conducted in Northwest Syria? | Regularly assess physical accessibility of health services, considering conflict-related movement restrictions. Monitor cost barriers to healthcare, including informal fees or transport costs. Evaluate quality of care across different types of health facilities. Assess integration of mental health and psychosocial support services into primary healthcare. Ensure cultural sensitivity in service provision, particularly regarding gender norms in healthcare access. | ICESCR Art. 12; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 55, 56, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Health Standards |
3. Implementation | 3.16 | Right to adequate housing;Right to private and family life; Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | Shelter | Percentage of constructed shelters meeting comprehensive standards: minimum Sphere requirements (3.5m² per person), verified HLP documentation, functional protection measures (insulation, waterproofing, ventilation), and accessibility features for persons with disabilities - measured through monthly technical and documentation assessments. | How effectively are adequate housing standards being monitored and implemented in shelter interventions while ensuring proper documentation and environmental considerations in Northwest Syria? | Begin by verifying proper HLP documentation for all construction sites, engaging legal experts when necessary to resolve land disputes. Monitor adherence to minimum Sphere standards, particularly the 3.5m² covered living space per person requirement. Ensure shelters provide adequate protection from weather conditions through proper insulation, waterproofing, and ventilation systems. Design must incorporate cultural sensitivity and privacy considerations, including separate spaces for families. Include specific adaptations for persons with disabilities, such as accessible entrances and facilities. Conduct environmental impact assessments before construction and implement mitigation measures throughout the project cycle. Establish community feedback mechanisms to monitor satisfaction with shelter conditions and respond to concerns. Regular technical assessments should verify structural integrity and maintenance needs. Consider long-term sustainability and transition planning, including capacity building for local maintenance. | ICESCR Article 11(1); ICCPR Art. 17, 23; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 50, 51, 52, 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Shelter and Settlement Standards UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement UNHCR Emergency Handbook Pinheiro Principles |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.1 | Right to life | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of protection risks successfully mitigated as verified through monitoring data, with quarterly assessments and trend analysis | How comprehensively are protection risks specific to Northwest Syria being systematically monitored? | Assess security incidents, access restrictions, and forced displacement patterns. Evaluate the effectiveness of risk reduction measures. Consider the impact of changing conflict dynamics on civilian protection. | ICCPR Art. 6; UDHR Art. 3; IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 55 and 56; SPHERE Protection Principles |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.2 | Right to private and family life | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage increase in service access for vulnerable groups, measured semi-annually and disaggregated by group type | How effectively is data being collected in a conflict-sensitive and protection-mainstreamed manner in Northwest Syria? | Implement robust data protection protocols considering the sensitive nature of information in conflict zones. Ensure safe data sharing practices between humanitarian actors, taking into account the fragmented control of territory. Obtain informed consent from beneficiaries, explaining potential risks in the local context. Maintain strict confidentiality measures to protect individuals from retaliation by armed groups or authorities. | ICCPR Art. 17, 23; SPHERE Protection Principles |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.3 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of beneficiaries reporting satisfaction with non-discriminatory service delivery, assessed through monthly surveys with a target of 90% satisfaction rate | How thoroughly is there systematic tracking of vulnerable groups' access to services in Northwest Syria? | Track access patterns for female-headed households, persons with disabilities, older people, IDPs in informal settlements, women, children, and ethnic/religious minorities. Consider specific barriers such as lack of documentation, movement restrictions, and discrimination by local authorities. Assess the impact of conflict dynamics on service accessibility for different groups. | UDHR Art. 6, ICCPR Art. 3, 16 26; IHL’s principle of non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Protection Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.4 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of service access cases enabled by alternative verification methods, tracked monthly with a target of 80% successful access rate | How accessible and effective are feedback and complaints mechanisms focused on human rights violations for all groups in Northwest Syria? | Ensure multiple channels for reporting rights violations, considering limited internet access and security concerns. Provide options in local languages and dialects. Implement gender-sensitive approaches, recognizing cultural barriers for women. Establish clear procedures for addressing human rights-related complaints, with safeguards against retaliation. Consider the challenges of operating across areas controlled by different actors. | ICCPR Art. 19; UDHR Art. 19; IHL’s principle of non-discrimination; CIHL Rule 134; SPHERE Core Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.5 | Multiple rights | Cross-Cutting | Protection Mainstreaming | Conduct comprehensive human rights impact assessments for all of project activities bi-annually, with action plans developed within 30 days of assessment | How comprehensive is the systematic documentation of human rights impacts in Northwest Syria? | Document protection incidents, including attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure. Record cases of denied humanitarian access. Track discrimination cases, particularly against IDPs or ethnic minorities. Assess positive impacts of humanitarian interventions on rights enjoyment. Identify unintended negative consequences of aid delivery on local dynamics. Consider the challenges of documentation in areas with limited access. | UDHR Art. 6, ICCPR Art. 3, 16 26; IHL’s principles of distinction,humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 28, 35, 50, 55, and 56; CHS Commitment 5 |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.6 | Right to own property; Right to adequate housing | Sector Specific | Shelter/HLP | Number of resolved HLP disputes through established project mechanisms | How effectively are Housing, Land and Property (HLP) rights being systematically monitored and evaluated in Northwest Syria? | Establish HLP-specific feedback channels, document trends in HLP violations and their impact on return prospects for IDPs, integrate HLP-related questions in implementation monitoring. | UDHR Art. 6, 17; ICESCR Art. 11(1), 16; CIHL Rules 50,51, 52, and 133; ICESCR CEDAW Art. 15, 16; CRPD Art. 12; OHCHR Guidelines; SPHERE Core Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.7 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Number of monitoring reports incorporating documented community feedback, disaggregated by age, gender, and vulnerability status, with evidence of implemented changes based on feedback | How meaningfully are affected populations involved in project monitoring and evaluation in Northwest Syria? | Implement community-based monitoring mechanisms, adapting to local power structures and security constraints. Use participatory evaluation methods that are culturally appropriate and conflict-sensitive. Document how community feedback influences project outcomes, ensuring transparency in decision-making. Ensure inclusion of marginalized groups in monitoring processes, overcoming barriers to participation. | ICCPR Art. 19; UDHR Art. 19; Pinheiro Principles; IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Shelter and Settlement Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.8 | Freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; Protection from child labour | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Number of suppliers audited for human rights compliance within the last 12 months, with results documented and improvement plans implemented where necessary. | How comprehensive is the ongoing monitoring of suppliers' human rights compliance in Northwest Syria? | Monitor adherence to supplier code of conduct, considering the challenges of operating in a conflict zone. Track reports of rights violations in suppliers' operations or supply chains. Monitor changes in ownership or management that might affect human rights compliance. Regularly update conflict of interest declarations, considering the complex local power dynamics. Assess any connections between suppliers and armed groups or sanctioned entities. | ICCPR Art. 7; UNCAT; ICESCR Art. 10(3); CRC Art. 32; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rule 90; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Core Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.9 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of community feedback cases addressed and resolved | How effectively are protection outcomes being measured in Northwest Syria? | Evaluate how specific protection risks have been addressed, such as reduction in civilian casualties or improved safety in IDP camps. Assess improvements in humanitarian access to hard-to-reach areas. Analyze community feedback on protection interventions. Identify any unintended impacts of protection activities on conflict dynamics. Measure long-term effects on rights enjoyment, considering the protracted nature of the crisis. | IHL’s principle of impartiality; CIHL Rules 55, 56, and 131 |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.1 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Conduct bi-annual impact assessments on identified vulnerable groups, with action plans developed within 1 month to address negative impacts | How comprehensively is the impact on vulnerable groups being assessed in Northwest Syria? | Assess improvements in service access for specific vulnerable groups, such as increased school enrollment for girls or improved healthcare access for persons with disabilities. Evaluate participation levels of marginalized groups in community decision-making. Analyze satisfaction rates with humanitarian assistance among different vulnerable populations. Identify remaining barriers to full rights enjoyment, considering the ongoing conflict context. | UDHR Art. 1, 2; ICCPR Art. 2; IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 134, 135, and 138; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Protection Principles |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.11 | Right to adequate food | Sector Specific | Food Security | Monitor 95% of food assistance recipients monthly for access and usage, with adjustments made within 14 days for identified issues | How effective are the systems to monitor equitable access to food assistance in Northwest Syria? | Monitor market price fluctuations, considering the impact of conflict on local economies. Assess distribution equity across different areas, including hard-to-reach locations. Consider the impact of sieges or access restrictions on food security. | ICESCR Art. 11; ; IHL’s principles of distinction and impartiality; CIHL Rules 53, 54, 55, and 56; SPHERE Food Security StandardsSPHERE Core Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.12 | Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | WASH | Conduct weekly WASH access monitoring in all IDP settlements, aiming for 90% of settlements meeting minimum standards within 3 months | How comprehensive is the systematic monitoring of WASH access in IDP settlements across Northwest Syria? | Track water quality and quantity, considering the strain on resources due to displacement. Assess the functionality and safety of gender-sensitive WASH facilities. Monitor environmental impact of WASH interventions, particularly in water-scarce areas. Evaluate maintenance needs and community capacity for upkeep. Consider the specific WASH needs of persons with disabilities in camp settings. | ICESCR Art. 11; IHL’s principles of impartiality, humane treatment, and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; UNGA Res 64/292; SPHERE WASH Standards; |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.13 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Identify and address at least 5 major health service access barriers per quarter, with solutions implemented within 60 days of identification | How thoroughly are health service access barriers being monitored in Northwest Syria? | Assess physical accessibility of health services, considering conflict-related movement restrictions and damage to infrastructure. Monitor cost barriers to healthcare, including informal fees or transport costs. Evaluate quality of care across different types of health facilities, including mobile clinics. Assess integration of mental health and psychosocial support services into primary healthcare. Ensure cultural sensitivity in service provision, particularly regarding gender norms in healthcare access. | ICESCR Art. 12; IHL’s principles of impartiality, non-discrimination, humane treatment and distinction; CIHL Rules 25, 26, 28, and 29, 55, 56, 134, 135, and 138. |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.14 | Right to education | Sector Specific | Education | Conduct monthly education quality monitoring visits to all supported facilities, with improvement plans developed within 14 days for underperforming sites | How comprehensive is the systematic monitoring of education quality in Northwest Syria, including specific considerations for girls? | Monitor learning outcomes, considering the challenges of education in conflict settings. Assess teacher qualifications and support needs. Evaluate curriculum relevance and appropriateness for the local context. Monitor safety of learning environments, including protection from attacks on schools. Assess gender-specific barriers and risks to education, such as early marriage or lack of female teachers. Evaluate inclusive teaching practices, particularly for children with disabilities and from minority groups. | CRC Art. 28, 29; ICESCR Art. 13; CEDAW Art. 10; IHL’s principle of distinction; CIHL Rules 7, 11, and 135; INEE Minimum Standards |
4. Monitoring and Evaluation | 4.15 | Right to adequate housing; Right to private and family life; Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | Shelter | Percentage of shelter projects meeting quality standards through: beneficiary satisfaction surveys (privacy, cultural appropriateness, accessibility), environmental impact compliance, and successful accommodation of vulnerable groups' needs - verified through quarterly monitoring assessments and disaggregated by gender and vulnerability status. | How effectively are shelter interventions ensuring adequate housing standards, environmental sustainability, and accessibility for persons with disabilities in Northwest Syria? | Shelter interventions must adhere to comprehensive standards to ensure they provide more than just basic protection. This involves ensuring that all shelters meet minimum Sphere standards for living space, privacy, and protection against environmental elements like cold, damp, and heat. It is crucial to verify Housing, Land, and Property (HLP) documentation to prevent disputes and ensure legal clarity. Environmental impact assessments should be conducted before construction, with mitigation measures implemented to minimize adverse effects. Shelters must be accessible to persons with disabilities, requiring timely modifications when needed. Regular monitoring should include community feedback mechanisms to assess satisfaction with privacy and cultural appropriateness. These efforts collectively aim to uphold the dignity and rights of displaced populations while promoting long-term sustainability and integration within local communities. | ICESCR Article 11(1); ICCPR Art. 17, 23; IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 133, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Shelter and Settlement Standards UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement; UNHCR Emergency Handbook Pinheiro Principles |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.1 | Right to life; Right to equality and non-discrimination; | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of project activities with successful handover to local stakeholders, with 90% target completion rate within the final quarter of the project | How comprehensive is the sustainability planning for the exit and transition phase in Northwest Syria? | Develop exit strategies that empower local communities and institutions, plan for gradual handover of services to local actors or authorities, assess long-term impact of interventions on community resilience. | UDHR Art. 1, 2; ICCPR Art. 6, 3, 26; CRC Art. 6; CHS Commitment 4; SPHERE Core Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.2 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of local partners demonstrating improved capacity in sustainable project management, assessed through pre- and post-training evaluations with a target of 75% improvement | How thoroughly is capacity building for transition being planned and implemented in Northwest Syria? | Identify and strengthen local partners for sustainable service delivery, develop training programs for local staff and community leaders, plan for knowledge transfer to ensure continuity of essential services. | UDHR Art. 1, 2; ICCPR Art. 6, 3, 26; CRC Art. 6; ICESCR Art. 2; CHS Commitment 3; SPHERE Core Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.3 | Multiple rights | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of beneficiaries reporting sustained access to services 6 months post-project, with a target of 80% sustained access rate | How comprehensively is conflict sensitivity being addressed in the transition planning for Northwest Syria? | Assess potential impact of exit on local power dynamics and conflict, develop strategies to mitigate risks of renewed tensions or rights violations, plan for ongoing monitoring of human rights situation post-exit. | ICESCR Art. 10, 11, 12, 19; ICCPR Art. 6; UDHR Art. 3; Do No Harm Principles; SPHERE Protection Principles |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.4 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of target communities with at least one established and functioning rights protection initiative 3 months post-project, aiming for 70% coverage | How effectively are long-term rights protection measures being integrated into the exit strategy for Northwest Syria? | Establish mechanisms for continued human rights monitoring after project end, develop advocacy strategies for ongoing protection of vulnerable groups, plan for long-term support to civil society and human rights defenders. | UDHR Art. 1, 2; ICCPR Art. 6, 3, 26; CRC Art. 6; CHS Commitment 7; SPHERE Core Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.5 | Multiple rights | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Document 100% of identified ongoing rights concerns, with action plans developed for 80% within 30 days of project closure | How thorough is the documentation of ongoing rights concerns in Northwest Syria? | Document unresolved protection cases, ensuring sensitive information is securely stored. Identify continuing risks, particularly for vulnerable groups like IDPs, women, and minorities. Provide detailed mitigation recommendations that consider the complex political and security landscape. Include lessons learned on rights protection in the specific context of NW Syria to inform future interventions. | IHL’s principles of humane treatment and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Protection Principles; OHCHR Manual on Human Rights Monitoring; IASC Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.6 | Multiple rights | Sector Specific | Protection | Percentage of project infrastructure maintained by local authorities 1 year post-handover, with a target of 85% functionality rate | How comprehensive are the measures to protect rights during sudden emergencies in Northwest Syria? | Develop rapid response mechanisms that can function in areas with limited access. Ensure protection mainstreaming across all emergency response sectors. Prioritize vulnerable groups in emergency planning, considering the specific risks faced by women, children, and persons with disabilities in the NW Syria context. Develop rights-based emergency protocols that can be quickly activated in case of sudden changes in conflict dynamics. | IHL’s principles of humane treatment, non-discrimination, and impartiality; CIHL Rules 55, 56, 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Core Standards; IASC Guidelines on the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.7 | Multiple rights | Sector Specific | Food Security | Number of lessons learned documented and shared with humanitarian community | How robust are the plans to ensure continuity of essential services during emergencies in Northwest Syria? | Identify and prepare backup service providers, considering the potential for rapid changes in territorial control. Develop alternative delivery methods that can function under siege-like conditions. Preposition emergency resources in strategic locations, accounting for potential access constraints. Implement rights-based prioritization in emergency service provision to ensure the most vulnerable are not left behind. | IHL’s principles of impartiality, humane treatment, and non-discrimination; CHIL Rules 55 and 56; CHS Commitment 2; ICESCR Art. 2, 11(1), 12; SPHERE Core Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.8 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Percentage of beneficiaries reporting improved resilience post-project | How thoroughly do contingency plans incorporate human rights considerations specific to Northwest Syria? | Address protection needs that may arise from sudden displacement or changes in conflict dynamics. Ensure plans for maintaining access to basic services under various scenarios of territorial control. Develop special measures for vulnerable groups, considering the heightened risks for women, children, and minorities in times of crisis. Incorporate non-discrimination principles in all contingency planning. | IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards; ICCPR Art. 26; IASC Guidelines on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.9 | Right of access to information | Cross-Cutting | AAP | Number of local organizations demonstrating enhanced capacity in rights-based programming | How meaningfully have affected populations been consulted in developing the exit strategy for Northwest Syria? | Gather community input on sustainability measures, considering diverse perspectives from host communities and IDPs. Obtain feedback on handover plans, ensuring representation from marginalized groups. Document how community concerns are addressed in the exit strategy, with particular attention to protection risks and service continuity. Ensure consultation methods are conflict-sensitive and do not exacerbate local tensions. | CIHL Rule 131; CHS Commitment 4; SPHERE Core Standards; ICCPR Art. 19; IASC Accountability to Affected Populations Commitments |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.1 | Multiple rights | Cross-Cutting | Do No Harm | Percentage of project activities successfully transitioned to local ownership | How comprehensive is the plan for responsible transition of procurement relationships in Northwest Syria? | Develop detailed handover plans for supplier relationships, considering the complex business environment in NW Syria. Transfer due diligence information securely, protecting sensitive data about local partners. Provide capacity building for local partners on responsible procurement, focusing on human rights and conflict sensitivity. Address any outstanding human rights issues with suppliers before exit, ensuring no unresolved violations are left behind. | UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct; CHS Commitment 9 |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.11 | Multiple rights | Sector Specific | Protection | Number of sustainable community-led initiatives established through project support | How effectively are protection services transitioning in Northwest Syria? | Develop comprehensive case management transfer plans, considering the fragmented protection actor landscape. Establish clear referral pathways that account for changing areas of control and access constraints. Provide targeted capacity support to local protection actors, focusing on both technical skills and ethical considerations. Ensure secure handover of sensitive documentation, protecting beneficiaries from potential retaliation. | SPHERE Protection Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.12 | Right to equality and non-discrimination | Cross-Cutting | Gender, Equality and Inclusion | Percentage of environmental protection measures maintained by community post-project | How sustainable are inclusion measures post-exit in Northwest Syria? | Assess local capacity to maintain inclusive practices, considering potential resource constraints. Evaluate the availability of resources for continued support to vulnerable groups. Foster community ownership of inclusion initiatives, adapting to local cultural contexts. Identify ongoing support needs, particularly for persons with disabilities, women, and marginalized groups. Develop long-term accessibility plans that can be maintained in a resource-constrained environment. | CRPD Art. 9, 19, CEDAW Art. 3; IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 134, 135, and 138; SPHERE Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.13 | Right to adequate food | Sector Specific | Food Security | Number of functional feedback mechanisms maintained by local stakeholders | How comprehensive are the measures to ensure sustainable food security post-exit in Northwest Syria? | Develop strategies for ongoing local market support, considering the impact of conflict on trade routes and agricultural production. Build community capacity in sustainable agriculture and food storage techniques. Establish alternative supply chains that can function under various conflict scenarios. Implement vulnerability reduction strategies, focusing on households most at risk of food insecurity due to displacement or loss of livelihoods. | ICESCR Art. 11(1); SPHERE Food Security Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.14 | Right to water and sanitation | Sector Specific | WASH | Percentage of protection mainstreaming measures integrated into local systems | How robust is the plan for sustainable WASH service delivery post-exit in Northwest Syria? | Build local maintenance capacity for WASH infrastructure, considering the challenges of accessing spare parts and technical expertise. Ensure availability of essential spare parts, accounting for potential supply chain disruptions. Establish community management structures for WASH facilities, adapting to local governance realities. Prioritize environmental sustainability in WASH solutions, considering the water scarcity issues in NW Syria. | ICESCR Art. 11(1), 12; CIHL Rules 131, 134, 135, and 138; UNGA Res 64/292, SPHERE WASH Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.15 | Right to health | Sector Specific | Health | Number of community members trained in rights-based approaches maintaining active roles | How comprehensive are the measures to ensure continued health service access post-exit in Northwest Syria? | Develop detailed service handover plans, considering the fragmented health system and potential gaps in coverage. Build local capacity in both clinical skills and health system management. Ensure sustainability of medical supply chains, accounting for potential border closures or access restrictions. Maintain referral systems for specialized care, considering cross-line and cross-border options. Prioritize the integration of mental health services into primary healthcare, addressing the long-term psychological impacts of conflict. | ICESCR Art. 12; IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; IHL’s principles of impartiality and non-discrimination; CIHL Rules 55, 56, 134, 135, and 138. |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.16 | Right to equality and non-discrimination; | Cross-Cutting | Protection | Number of documented human rights lessons learned and best practices shared | How comprehensive is the plan to transfer knowledge and skills related to cross-cutting themes to local partners and communities? | Develop training programs for local organizations on gender-sensitive programming, protection mainstreaming, and environmental sustainability. Establish community-led committees to continue addressing cross-cutting issues post-exit. Create mentorship programs pairing international and local staff to ensure knowledge transfer. Develop context-specific guidance materials on maintaining progress in cross-cutting areas. | CHS Commitment 3, 4; SPHERE Core Standards |
5. Exit and Transition | 5.17 | Right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment | Cross-Cutting | Environmental Protection | Percentage of project activities with documented positive human rights impacts | How robust are the measures to ensure environmental sustainability of interventions post-exit? | Develop local environmental management plans that can be maintained with limited resources. Train community members on sustainable resource management practices. Establish partnerships with local environmental organizations for ongoing monitoring and support. Ensure all infrastructure projects incorporate long-term environmental considerations. | UNGA Res 76/300; SPHERE Environmental Standards |